Compare/ Contrast the Nez Perce Culture
Before and After the Horse
Presentation Rubric
|
CRITERIA |
1 POINT |
2 POINTS |
3 POINTS |
4 POINTS |
TOTAL |
|
Subject Knowledge/Content |
Subject knowledge is not evident. Information is confusing, incorrect, and flawed. |
Some knowledge is evident, but some information is confusing and/or incorrect. |
Knowledge is evident in much of the project. Most information is clear and correct. |
Subject knowledge is evident throughout the project. All information is clear and correct. |
|
|
Introduction/ Conclusion |
There is no definite introduction or conclusion. |
There is an introduction but no conclusion or visa versa |
There is evidence of an introduction and a conclusion. |
The introduction has a sharp focus, and the conclusion is effective. |
|
|
Writing Mechanics |
Many errors in spelling, grammar, sentence structure destroy content & major revision is needed |
Spelling and grammar errors detract but content is understandable |
The text is clearly written but a few spelling and/or grammar errors are noticeable |
The text is clearly written with little or no errors to detract from content. |
|
|
Layout |
The layout is unstructured, confusing, and cluttered. Does not use space correctly. The text is very difficult to read |
The layout shows some structure but the space is not used well, appearing cluttered or empty. Overall readability is difficult. |
The layout uses most space appropriately. Most slides are easy to read. |
The layout is pleasing to the eye, appropriate to the message, and uses space well. Fonts and point size are well chosen for easy readability. |
|
|
Presentation |
Spoken and visual presentation difficult to follow and understand. Little eye contact. Reads material from notes. |
Spoken and visual presentation not well integrated. Some organization is evident. Some eye contact but much reading. |
Integrates spoken and visual presentation. Organization apparent and appealing. Maintains balanced eye contact between audience. |
Effectively integrates spoken and visual presentation. A high degree of organization, eye appeal, and effective delivery. Excellent eye contact and knowledge o subject. Does not refer to notes very much. |
|